Isnin, 28 Januari 2013

Cancer Protocols Best To Avoid



Cancer Protocols Best To Avoid

Radiation, Chemo, Mammographs - plus Special Focus on Breast Cancer Avoidance.

Have you thought to question the sanity of poisoning your own body with extremely carcinogenic chemicals, which are now proven to have the side effect of causing even more cancer at later time?


Appallingly, every year, over 1 million cancer patients receive toxic chemotherapy, radiation, or both. This is YOUR life, YOUR future, YOUR health, YOUR body - YOUR choice, YOU decide.

 

INTRODUCTION:
Radiation and Chemo damage respiratory enzymes in healthy cells, and overload them with toxins, so they become more likely to develop into cancer. The immune system becomes further compromised, and the underlying cancer causing conditions are worsened, not improved. This is followed by the cancer typically returning quickly for a second time, unless you make dramatic physical, emotional and dietary changes to support the health of your body.

Western Medicine Cancer Protocol - Cut, Poison and Burn the Body.
Hair falls out, brain cells are fried, skin is burnt, immune system is shattered. Long term damage often includes secondary cancer, infertility and sterility.

 

RADIATION - Over 110 years old - OUTDATED PROTOCOL

Apparently there is no large cumulative study to support the overall survival rates of radiation therapy i.e.There is no data to justify radiation, so why is it being implemented daily? The answer is money, and indoctrinated belief systems instilled within medical orthodox scripture, used to educate the medical professional regarding standard cancer protocol, which does not waver: drugs, surgery, chemo and radiation. The cancer industry turns over in excess of $200 billion annually.

There is a reason your dentist moves into another room while performing x-rays on your teeth, or the lab technician leaves the room when you have an x-ray ... cumulative radiation dosage causes cancer.

There is also bioaccumulation from toxic chemicals in food preservatives, coloring, artificial sweeteners, flavor or aroma enhancer etc which build up internally within your very own body...

'The latest published data on radiation exposure suggests that roughly 25,000 Americans develop cancer every year as a result of medical radiation exposure, and many more experience DNA damage that could eventually lead to the development of cancer and other health problems in the long term.

Every year, millions of Americans opt to undergo computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and X-ray scans for medical purposes, thinking that by doing so, they are keeping up with the latest technologies in advanced medical care. But each time medical patients get one of these scans, their bodies sustain varying levels of ionizing radiation, the negative effects of which can take years to manifest as they build up cumulatively over time.

CT scans, which are a relatively modern medical imaging technology, are particularly problematic as they emit far higher doses of radiation than traditional x-rays do. Based on the figures, a single CT scan can blast up to 500 times the amount of radiation released by a single x-ray, an astounding level when considering how gratuitously CT scans are administered within the medical profession today.' - Source: naturalnews.com

 

 

The worldwide average background radiation dose for a human being is about 2.4 millisievert (mSv) per year. Highly targeted dose used in conventional cancer radiotherapy (single dose) is 2,000 mSv!

 

Click This Link: Detailed Radiation Dosage Chart including other medical protocols as well as cancer radiotherapy.

 

CANCER RADIATION - KNOWN SIDE EFFECTS:
Side effects may be more severe if you also receive chemotherapy before, during, or after your radiation therapy.

1) Skin changes may include severe dryness, itching, peeling, blistering, skin burning, skin color change and sensitivity to sunlight.
2) Extreme fatigue.
3) Decrease in white blood cell count, which means a higher risk for infection.
4) Possibilities: Anemia, diarrhea, hair loss in the treatment area, mouth problems, nausea and vomiting, sexuality changes, lymphedema, restriction of movement, trouble swallowing, loss of appetite, urinary and bladder changes. Persistent cough, shortness of breath, dizziness, chest pains.
5) Side effects after 6 months may include infertility, joint problems and secondary cancer.
6) Lung or heart problems may develop during following years, and are permanent.
7) Radiation’s effects on the tissues continue to worsen for years after the initial treatment.


The entire conflict is that conventional medicine only addresses and treats  the manifestation of any disease ... a mindset that is not trained, or cares to address, THE SOURCE, and thereby prevent it from occurring again!

Guliana Rancic, TV host and Wanda Sykes, Comedian.
Guliana had early stage breast cancer and Wanda had Stage 0.
Both opted for double mastectomy, no radiation, No chemo.
Actress Christina Applegate chose the same, also no chemo or radiation.

 

TIP: If you receive radiation for cancer, rub aloe vera juice (taken from a fresh cut leaf of the plant), on the area receiving radiation. This will aid in prevention of skin burns and tissue damage.


CHEMO - Over 60 years old - OUTDATED PROTOCOL

How did chemo come into existence?

'Chemotherapy was first discovered in the 1940's while testing the effects of the chemical warfare material "mustard gas". It was found that humans exposed to mustard gas had profound lymphoid and myeloid suppression. This observation was reason to believe that such a chemotherapeutic agent could be successful in treating lymphoma - and indeed it was. Shortly after World War II, more research was done that found that other chemicals used in a similar fashion were effective against leukemia. Once chemotherapy regimens were explored further, it soon became the norm to give chemotherapeutic agents to any and everyone suffering from an inoperable cancer without any evidence to justify it. Why? Mainly because there simply wasn't any other options available at the time.' - Source: www.burzynskimovie.com


Chemo continues to be used despite the proven fact that alternative

options exist and are NOT TOXIC.

The reason alternative options - such as Cannabinoids, Antineoplastons, Far Infrared Therapy, Baking Soda and Diet change - are not supported or recommended by conventional medicine, is because:

a) Plants cannot be patented.

b) Trillions of dollars would be lost by big pharma and their investors, and conventional medical professionals.

c) Alternative cancer therapy options cost a fraction compared to conventional cancer therapy.

d) Fear frequently dominates new cancer patients and that dictates conventional cancer therapy as the easiest option for many cancer patients, their family and friends, because that is all they have been taught. Doctors are not going to guide them any differently, or reveal they would never do chemo for themselves!


1) The Royal College of Radiologists conducted an extensive study reviewing any and all published peer-reviewed clinical trials across the United States involving the use of chemotherapy treatment from January 1990 to January 2004. The combined total percentage of 5-year survival rates in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy - covering 22 different types of malignancies - was a mere 2.1%.

Read the study for yourself, which includes over 15 different types of cancer:


Chemotherapy drugs are cytotoxic, meaning they poison the cells in our body that multiply the most rapidly, which is how the majority of cancer cells perform. Chemo drugs however don't just kill the cancer cells that are dividing, but any dividing cell, including the multitude of healthy cells all over the body caught in the act of dividing. For those whose 'healthy' cells are multiplying faster than the cancer cells, there isn't even a theoretical chance of success. This explains why chemotherapy is effective in only 2 to 4% of cancers - primarily, Hodgkin's disease, Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Testicular cancer, and Choriocarcinoma.

For the majority of people who have healthy cell division, you may end up killing the body before the cancer. For instance, there is a high probability that certain fast multiplying immune system cells including our T and B lymphocytes will also die, contributing to our body's inability to fight opportunistic diseases that arise as a result of the treatment. Other cells that grow fast are cells of the bone marrow that produce blood cells, cells in the stomach and intestines, and cells of the hair follicles, which is why a patient's hair usually falls out. - extract from:

www.whale.to/cancer/barron.html


2) CHEMO - KNOWN SIDE EFFECTS:

The American Chinese Medicine Association has said that "most cancer patients die of chemotherapy." Hmmm, so how does this factor into the medical dictum "First Do No Harm"? ... It doesn't.

Chemotherapy symptoms may include nausea, vomiting, hair loss, nail loss, bleeding gums, muscle loss, nerve damage, immune system damage and also possible brain damage, heart damage, kidney damage or liver damage - this damage may become permanent for some women.

Of 4075 breast cancer patients who had chemotherapy, roughly one in six of these patients showed up in the emergency room or were hospitalized due to side effects, such as low blood pressure, dehydration, or nausea. - JNCI 2006 study, Hassett M et al.

There are 201 side effects listed on the Chemocare website: www.chemocare.com/managing/

 

Robin Roberts, TV host - 2007, Partial mastecomy and lumpectomy, chemo, and lymph nodes removed at 46yrs - 2012 5yr marker. June 2012 diagnosed with MDS (bone and blood marrow disorder - preleukemia). The breast cancer chemo caused the MDS.
Read more: www.wfaa.com/news/health/A-Second-Battlle-158484025.html

 

3) CHEMO BRAIN: Changes in memory, attention, concentration, and abilities to perform various mental tasks. Common side effect in breast cancer patients.

Doctors commonly deny that the cognitive problems reported by breast cancer patients following chemotherapy are in any way related to the toxic treatment. But a new study published in the journal Archives of Neurology points to clear evidence of what is known as "chemo brain," or brain damage caused by chemotherapy.


Learn more:

www.naturalnews.com/034391_breast_cancer_chemotherapy_brain_damage.html#ixzz1wc91Luzg
www.naturalnews.com/034157_chemotherapy_brain_damage.html


PET scans revealed a link between chemo-brain symptoms and lower metabolism in the frontal cortex. The lower the metabolism in the frontal cortex and the cerebellum, the more difficult it is to perform a short-term memory exercise.


Learn more: breastcancerchoices.org/faqtreatment.html

 

4) "The advantage with choosing chemotherapy ... is that you don't have to change your eating habits or think outside the box. Your doctor will tell you what to do, what pills to take, what questions to stop asking, etc., and he won't even request that you stop eating those cancer-causing hot dogs..."

"Those who make the worst choices in life also tend to make the worst choices about the way they die. If they lived a toxic lifestyle that gave them cancer in the first place, they almost always choose a toxic chemotherapy death to go with it."

"The cancer industry loves to talk about those people who are "survivors" of cancer and chemotherapy. But they never talk honestly about those who were killed by their poison. The truth is simply swept away, dumped in a casket and buried along with the victim. It's all business as usual for the U.S. cancer industry."

Read full article:

http://www.naturalnews.com/027030_cancer_chemotherapy_natural.html#ixzz1wgenHJlJ


NEWSFLASH: Woops! Study Accidentally Finds Chemotherapy Makes Cancer Far Worse.

... 'chemotherapy actually heavily damages healthy cells and subsequently triggers them to release a protein that sustains and fuels tumor growth. Beyond that, it even makes the tumor highly resistant to future treatment.'

... 'Meanwhile, dirt cheap substances like turmeric and ginger have consistently been found to effectively shrink tumors and combat the spread of cancer. In a review of 11 studies, it was found that turmeric use reduced brain tumor size by a shocking 81%.'


Read more: naturalsociety.com/chemotherapy-makes-cancer-far-worse/#ixzz25kcADOf2

Tumeric Blocks Cancer Growth: naturalsociety.com/woman-stuns-researchers-by-overcoming-cancer-with-turmeric-spice/


5) Non-Chemo Breast Cancer Therapy is Doubling Survival Rates:

In the USA, only 44% of Stage IV breast cancer patients who undergo conventional cancer therapy are still alive after 2 years. A new cancer protocol using high-dose, intravenous vitamin C at The Oasis of Hope in Tijuana, Mexico is experiencing a 73% two-year survival rate. The center is also experiencing a 90% two-year survival rate with their IRT-Q protocol when this is the patient’s first option. The IRT-Q protocol is also obtaining a 300% improvement in four-year survival: 78% for the IRT-Q therapy versus 25% for conventional therapy.

Learn more: www.oneradionetwork.com/newsflash/non-chemo-breast-cancer-therapy-doubling-survival-rates-article/


6) More and more people are refusing chemo and radiation, instead choosing natural, non-toxic methods and diet to heal themselves:
Excellent website blog with great articles and public feedback about cancer and how to beat it - written by Chris Wark diagnosed with Stage 3 Colon Cancer in 2003, at 26 years old. He had surgery, but refused chemo. Instead he used nutrition and natural therapies to heal himself.
Website: chrisbeatcancer.com

Survivors of chemo MAKE DRAMATIC LIFESTYLE CHANGES,
 emotionally, physically and nutritionally - there is NO other SANE choice.

MAMMOGRAMS:
Radiation from mammograms may CAUSE cancer. The severe tissue compression involved may induce metastases if a tumor already exits. Mammography is an extremely inneffective diagnostic tool (it misses about 20% of cancers) but it also subjects the breast tissue to radiation! Every time you get a mammogram, your chances for getting cancer increase.

Learn more:


 

Digital Thermograph - Radiation Free - Safer and more Accurate than a Mammogram.

Thermography checks for inflammation throughout the body (first sign of disease) and can detect future disease sites by reading higher temperatures in body parts that are at risk.

 

Thermography, around since the 1960's and only recently available in the USA, offers a highly accurate means of detecting developing breast cancers by offering graphical evidence of angiogenesis (increased blood vessel growth that occurs to feed a tumor). Thermography can identify pre-cancerous changes 5-10 years before a mammogram detects a lump! Cost? About $150-$250. By detecting a pre-cancerous environment, life style and diet changes can be implemented immediately.


Alternative to mammograms - Breast Thermography:

What is Breast Thermography?

www.breastthermography.com/breast_thermography_mf.htm
Dr. Kaslow, California:

www.drkaslow.com/html/breast_thermography.html
Learn more: www.breastthermography.com

More info: breastcancerchoices.org/faqimaging.html



BREAST CANCER STATS:

Every year, approximately 180,000 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 44,000 will die of the disease, according to the American Cancer Society. The U.S. has one of the highest breast cancer rates in the world. The possibility of breast cancer over a woman's lifetime has skyrocketed to one in eight.


Asian women have some of the lowest
breast cancer rates in the world ... until they adopt a Western diet!

One study found that post-menopausal Chinese women who followed a “meat and sweet” Western-style diet were 60 percent more likely to get breast cancer than same-age Chinese women who followed a “soy and vegetable” traditional Chinese diet. The effect was more significant for estrogen-receptor positive tumors, whose growth is nurtured by estrogen. The risk of getting this type of breast cancer was increased 90 percent by the Western-style diet.

Source: www.dnafiles.org/outreach/ethnic-media-fellows/new-york-breast-cancer-among-chinese-women


BREAST RECONSTRUCTION - Life after Mastectomy.

Part of being a women means embracing your sexuality and female physiology. Being faced with the decision to have your breasts cut off or not, is obviously extremely traumatic, an extreme, radical choice, and life changing on every level.

Breast reconstruction will give you back your breasts and your self esteem. There are choices for your new physical identity:

a) Tissue expanders - 'balloons' injected with saline to stretch skin - which takes several months followed by implants.
b) AirXpanders - patient fills 'balloons' daily with small CO2 dosage using hand held device, no pain, no needles - which take 6 to 20 days followed by implants.
c) Tram or Diep Flap.
d) CAL.

1) a) Three weeks after double mastectomy with tissue expanders:  www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqamjACJ_-0&feature=related

b) Six months after double mastectomy with tissue expanders - 31 year old mom who was diagnosed with Stage 1, triple negative breast cancer - double mastectomy, reconstruction, and 4 rounds of chemo: www.youtube.com/watch?v=2b4_ppGmCuM

2) Tram Flap - natural body tissue from abdomen: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bh7B8m898dw&feature=related

3) CAL: Fat and Stem Cell Breast Reconstruction - No Cutting, No Implants, Feeling Is Retained - Completely Natural:
In 2003, Kotaro Yoshimura, MD, a professor and surgeon at the University of Tokyo in Japan, began testing an innovative procedure he called cell-assisted lipotransfer, or CAL, in which autologous adipose-derived stem cells (those extracted from a person’s own fat) are injected along with other fat cells to plump up or replace tissue, as in the breast.

Both implants and TRAM flaps leave some scarring, which isn’t an issue with CAL, since there’s no cutting involved.

 

Suzanne Somers - 2001 Lupectomy, 35 days of radiation, then CAL in 2011

Suzanne Somers waited over 10 years for her breast reconstruction. In Aug 2011, she finally got her new, all natural breast: "The whole procedure took just a couple of hours from start to finish, and most of that time was spent isolating the stem cells and mixing them with Somers’ fat, which had been taken from her hip and abdomen via liposuction. The actual “reconstruction” part of the procedure was relatively quick - but dramatic. - In less than 10 minutes, I watched this sad little breast puff up like a balloon, - I couldn’t believe my eyes. No cutting, no blood, no implant. Just two or three small entrance holes, and suddenly there were two symmetrical breasts.”

Read entire report: www.everydayhealth.com/breast-cancer/suzanne-somers-and-the-future-of-breast-reconstruction.aspx

 

2012: One woman is diagnosed with breast cancer every three minutes, and one woman will die of breast cancer every 13 minutes in the U.S.


 



10 BREAST CANCER TIPS:

 

1) AVOID ROOT CANALS:

It has now been proven that breast cancer, more often than not, is caused by dental infections which travel via the lymph system, between the mouth and the breasts. Root canals create a safe-haven for cancer-causing bacteria which when performed on the same meridian as the breasts, causes breast cancer. These infections can be identified by thermographs from the nose to the waist. They are the thin red lines which may be between the breast and mouth, for example. The only way to kill the microbes in the lymph system is with electromedicine or alkalinity. Again, alkalinity of the body is critical, and sugar is deadly. Research Dr. Thomas Rau of the Paracelsus Clinic in Switzerland. In a study of 150 breast cancer patients by Dr. Rau, 147 of them had had root canals on the same acupuncture meridian as the breast cancer. The other 3 also had dental problems on the same meridian, but they were not root canals, they were infections in the jawbone. Mike Vrentas (Cellect-Budwig) and Bill Henderson are also experts in this area.

The Relationship Between Root Canals and Cancer:
www.new-cancer-treatments.org/Articles/RootCanals.html



2) MELATONIN AND BREAST CANCER:

Normal production of melatonin in the pineal gland inhibits the production and overproduction of estrogen, however, many environmental factors inhibit the production of melatonin: electromagnetic fields (remove cell phone, computer and electric clock from bedroom), strong night lighting (turn of TV before sleeping), alcohol, aging, medications. 'Laboratory experiments have found that low levels of melatonin stimulate the growth of certain types of breast cancer cells - A high number of women with estrogen receptor positive tumors have low levels of melatonin in their blood.' Learn more: breastcancerchoices.org/melatonin.html




3) Another reason to eat ORGANIC:

"Pesticides mimic the action of estrogen in your body in that they can lock onto receptors in the your breasts and stimulate cell division. Even small amounts of pesticides can be dangerous to women, because they tend to concentrate to high levels in fat cells, and breasts are comprised mostly of fat cells." - International Wellness Directory.

 

4) PARABENS and BREAST CANCER

a) A new study out of the University of Reading (UR) in the UK has found that, based on tests conducted, nearly every single woman with breast cancer has one or more paraben chemicals in her breast tissue, suggesting a possible link between the chemical and the disease. Check that all personal hygene products and cosmetics do not contain parabens.

Learn more:

www.naturalnews.com/034680_breast_cancer_parabens_women.html#ixzz1wc5VNqlM

b) No Antiperspirant - Nearly all breast cancer tumors occur in the upper outside quadrant of the breast area. This is precisely where the lymph nodes are located. Women who apply anti-perspirant right after shaving increase the risk further because shaving causes almost imperceptible nicks in the skin which give the chemicals entrance into the body from the armpit area. - Source www.americanaci.org

Deodorant is ok providing there is no aluminum content. Look for the brand TOMS which contains no aluminum.


5) 'Do you know how to REVERSE BREAST CANCER using NUTRITION?'
Excellent blog about breast cancer containing a wealth of information which includes the journey of a Danish doctor, Kristine Nolfi, who after discovering breast cancer, turned to raw food and sunshine, and cured herself. She was initially ridiculed by the conventional medical community but went on to become highly respected.

Another observation noted here (confirmed and proven scientifically), is that "the Chinese eat mainly cleansing foods: vegetables, grains and legumes, some fish and no dairy. What is of inestimable importance is the fact that they obtain 7% of their protein from animal products, whereas Americans obtain 70% of their protein from animal products." Chinese women have very low rates of breast cancer because they don't consume dairy. - Source: www.angelfire.com/ia/trikay/nolfi.html

 


6) Breast Cancer Patients have high ESTROGEN levels:

a) Body-fat is the primary source of estrogen production. Insulin promotes the storage of body-fat, and cancer cells thrive on sugar delivered courtesy of insulin. Chronically high insulin levels, like excessive body-fat, are associated with increased breast cancer risk.

What does this mean? DIET IS EVERYTHING! Stop eating foods that spike your blood sugar, necessitating the release of insulin to normalize blood glucose levels.  Specifically, AVOID SUGAR and DAIRY.

b) Do not get an estrogen patch! Too many women have triggered breast cancer soon after wearing one, due to already perfect cancer conditions set up internally, ready to explode. Ideal conditions for breast cancer are a daily diet of animal protein and soda, minimal to zero plant proteins, frequent dairy products, deep stress, ongoing prescribed medications, and lack of sunshine.



c) Breast Cancer patients also have low DHEA levels and low Vitamin D. Boost with daily exercise, 15 minutes of sunshine daily and a plant protein diet, NOT an animal protein diet.

Feeding your body the correct nutrition makes it extremely difficult to become ill. Estrogen levels will be stabilized, menopause symptoms will be minimal to zero, and breast cancer simply cannot exist.


7) Zinc, Selenium, Iodine ... and Cigarettes:

Breast Cancer patients have low ZINC, IODINE and SELENIUM levels. Lack of zinc has been implicated not only in the initiation of breast cancer, but also in the transition, progression, and metastasis of the disease. When zinc is deficient, cellular functioning in the breast is compromised.

When Zinc is deficient, CADIUM levels increase - cadium is found in cigarettes from the tobacco's agricutural fertiliser.
Learn more: cancer-diet.html#cigarettes


8) BRAS:

Wear your bra for the least amount of hours possible. The longer you wear a bra, the higher the chance for breast cancer. Reason? Lymphatic congestion, the breasts overheat. - Read more: breastcancerchoices.org/breastdetox.html

Jacklyn Smith from original "Charlies Angels". 2002 Lumpectomy and Radiation, Stage 1 Breast Cancer - 10yrs clear 2012. She focuses on veggies and fruit, minimal meat, does Pilates and daily exercise.

 

9) Factors and red flags that place a woman at risk for breast cancer:
a) Early menstruation.
b) High blood cholesterol (diet).
c) Late menopause.
d) High exposure to female hormones (red meat, soya beans, dairy products - estrogen patches).
e) HRT (hormone replacement therapy to alleviate menopause effects), has been proven to lead to breast cancer.
f) Lack of Iodine (seafood, Greek yogurt, boiled eggs), Zinc (seafood, nuts and seeds), Selenium (fish, Brazil nuts), Vitamin D (sunshine) and Vitamin C.
g) Diet with frequent consumption of animal protein (red meat, chicken, milk and cheese, processed foods, fried food) and sugar (especially soda's and high fructose corn syrup).
h) Holding on to negative emotions of anger, pain and grief from traumatic life experiences and loss.
i) Having a baby after age 30 yrs, or never having a baby.
j) Root canals. Trapped bacteria travels down meridians from root canal to breast.
k) Lack of sleep in dark, quiet room - turn TV off!
l) Multiple mammograms.
m) Frequent hot showers in chlorinated water - use a filter.
n) Frequent use of prescribed medications.
o) Obesity. Body fat stores estrogen which can trigger cancer during menopause.
p) Lack of exercise - get your body moving for oxygenation, detox and to remove excess body fat.
q) Microwaved food - toss it! Microwaved food changes the cellular structure of food which interferes with your DNA.
r) Frequent cell phone use. Always use speakerphone. Never sleep with cell phone in bedroom.

Learn More: 'The China Study' by T. Colin Campbell, PhD. - available at Amazon.com, MUST READ!

Gloria Steinem
, famous journalist and activist, has said that by eating the right foods, teenage pregnancy could be reduced by delaying the onset of menstruation. Steinem had breast cancer diagnosis in 1986, and chose a lumpectomy plus 6 weeks of radiation - she is now 78yrs old. To quote Gloria Steinem "The first problem for all of us, men and women, is not to learn, but to unlearn." Apply this to Western diet guidance, causes given for cancer, and conventional cancer therapy protocol safety!


10) "1 a MINUTE" - MOVIE.

One hour 29 mins long. Recommended for all breast cancer patients. One woman's journey, from breast cancer diagnosis thru chemo - including several famous women who comment on their own cancer experience.
www.hulu.com/watch/279522/1-a-minute


 

BONUS: THE MIND/BODY CONNECTION - CHI LEL and EFT.

1) Meet Ginny Walden, National Champion swimmer, who overcame Stage 3 Breast Cancer. This is a true story of a brave lady who refused to give in to cancer - a woman who faced her inner issues, released them and healed her body of cancer. Ginny Walden turned to Chi-Lel, the power of CHI - the natural life force energy present within every living thing - to heal herself completely.

2) EFT (Emotional Freedom Technique) is energy healing of the body created by stimulation of specific physical meridians by simply tapping them with your fingers.

'Faster EFT Tapping' processes explained and demonstrated for everyone by Robert G. Smith (in case you don't know, this gentleman is THE best at EMF): www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFo7iKqqV5w&feature=relmfu

Make peace with whatever upsets you - take ownership ... tap away your emotional issues and heal yourself. Watch Robert use EFT (Emotional Freedom Technique) on a lady with breast cancer: www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJSwz3dh0yc


If you eat a plant protein diet instead of an animal protein diet,
you can AVOID cancer and REVERSE cancer. You can avoid having
your breasts cut off, and avoid flooding your body with poison chemicals.

TREAT THE SOURCE OF THE DISEASE - Diet AND Emotions -
instead of using toxic band-aids chemo, radiation and drugs.

If you choose poison to treat your cancer AND still DO NOT
change your diet and mindset, you WILL suffer consequences.
For too many, this will mean death. The choice is yours.

YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT HAS NEVER BEEN MORE TRUE ...
IF MAN MADE IT, DON'T EAT IT!



CANCER DIET
A Matter of Life or Death. Taking action to make your body more alkaline is critical in the battle against cancer. The majority of food and drinks most people consume are acidic, such as meat, grains and sugar, with sodas being highly acidic. So unless you have been eating a healthy diet, full of fresh fruit and vegetables, your body is way too acidic which creates an excellent environment for cancer to grow and thrive in. There is a long history of reversing cancer simply by alkalinizing the body. It is one of the basic strategies in the battle against cancer.
 -
Extract from cancer-prevention.net


CANCER
Proven Strategies.

 SITE MAP
The most extensive info on the internet for revolutionary
healing machines, health and nutritional guidance.

 

Mat Saleh pun dah beralih ke Alam Semulajadi


 

Mat Saleh pun dah beralih ke Alam Semulajadi… Ikuti perbualan mereka…


Sorry, Conan, but the claims on vitamin D and cancer are not very convincing. RESULTS: "We found no strong or statistically significant association between serum 25(OH)D and bladder cancer risk...

CONCLUSION:

"In contrast to an earlier report, we observed no association between vitamin D status and risk of bladder cancer; this difference could be due to the inclusion of women and nonsmokers in the current study population or due to the differences in the distribution of vitamin D concentrations between the two study populations."

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22623707
These sorts of studies show associations that may or not pan out:

"Right now, promoting strong bones is the only proven health claim that can be made for vitamin D. But as the Institute of Medicine (IOM) pointed out when it issued new vitamin D recommendations last fall (200 to 600 international units daily for most Americans under the age of 70), very few individuals need to take supplements for this purpose."

"Most of us...
get plenty of vitamin D from our food and from natural sunlight, the IOM stressed."

"Some randomized trials have revealed evidence that vitamin D may have beneficial health effects not associated with bone strength, but, as Smith notes, that evidence was produced "mostly as an afterthought":

"Many of the randomized trials people have heard about were trials designed to look at the effect of vitamin D on fractures and falls," [said Dr. Jo Ann Manson, the lead investigator for the VITAL study and a professor of epidemiology and women's health at Harvard University], with other effects as secondary outcomes."

"It's in the nature of statistics, she pointed out, that if researchers look at enough outcomes, some will be significant just on the basis of chance."

"The vast mass of the evidence for any kind of nonskeletal benefit is observational, and therefore suspect until confirmed by a properly designed, randomized trial, Manson said."

http://www.minnpost.com/second-opinion/2011/11/despite-hype-hard-evidence-vitamin-d-health-claims-remains-lacking
So it would be more convincing to have evidence from a randomized trial (in other words, assign people to different groups with different levels of vitamin D intake) to see who develops bladder cancer.

And in any case, what does this have to do with the original premise of this discussion (the idea that "yes - you can cure yourself of cancer")?
Are you suggesting that people with bladder cancer or at risk of bladder cancer should just pop vitamin D supplements and ignore proper medical screening and care?

Do you ever read these breathless reports on naturalsociety.com or naturalnews.com and ask yourself these kinds of questions? Or is it easier to regurgitate whatever glurge that seems to be anti-mainstream medicine?*

Now, now, you know that plants growing in distant parts of the world can invariably cure all ills known to mankind, but only if you haven't heard of the plant before. Also, as seems to be the case on the site that she was trying to promote, such plants can create Cindarella-like beauty for anyone who uses any "beauty" product containing ingredients from said plants. Unlike pharmaceutical companies, which seek to make money, the promoters of these substances, as we all know, give them away to anyone who needs them.

In this case, the now-deleted posts were part of the
moringa bandwagon. Moringa, also known as the horseradish plant, does have its advocates. See the 2007 Pakistani review, at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17089328
: "Various parts of this plant such as the leaves, roots, seed, bark, fruit, flowers and immature pods act as cardiac and circulatory stimulants, possess antitumor, antipyretic, antiepileptic, antiinflammatory, antiulcer, antispasmodic, diuretic, antihypertensive, cholesterol lowering, antioxidant, antidiabetic, hepatoprotective, antibacterial and antifungal activities, and are being employed for the treatment of different ailments in the indigenous system of medicine, particularly in South Asia." I'm not sure if there are any potential medicinal properties that did not get mentioned, but if you have a disease that cannot be treated by it, you obviously aren't really sick. There is an interesting recent review, a free copy of which is available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290775/
, which points out, "The enthusiasm for the health benefits of M. oleifera is in dire contrast with the scarcity of strong experimental and clinical evidence supporting them." Excuse me, I have to go outside to plant my moringa garden.

 

Herba Sembuhkan Barah


Herba Sembuhkan Barah


Getting my kids up for their Saturday workout, I started thinking about my book, Over-The-Counter Natural Cures...It has had an amazing impact on my family and many others. The health we enjoy today is a result of that single piece of work, which took years.

Thanks to it, we've been able to:

- Avoid vaccines and antibiotics,
- Teach our family how to eat for maximum health and muscle,
- Show kids why select sweets are bad for them,
- Help parents shed fat,
- Outline exactly how to beat diabetes in as little as 30 days,
- Give proven alternatives to chemotherapy for overcoming cancer,
- Give dads a second chance by helping them reverse heart disease,
- Turn back the clock for moms who want to wipe away premature wrinkles.
...And so much more.

It takes a lot of motivation to write such a successful book. When I wrote
Over-The-Counter Natural Cures, I was
ultimately motivated by my kids. Today, there isn't a single book I'd trust their health to...And
someday, when they're grown and have a family of their own, they'll
need it as a guide.
Otherwise, I thought, they'd be forced into a system of health slavery. Or lost in a sea of confusion and contradictions common to "alternative health nuts."

I didn't want that to happen.

So at the very least, I told myself that my book would be the definitive
"medicine guide" for my entire family. It would, for the first time,
explain what medicine is and how to use it to live young,
without the
hassle or expense of modern day medicine.

Since writing it, this fun-to-read book has served its purpose many times
over. Success stories have piled in! Stories that wouldn't DARE make
the news...Like this one from a fan
who faced a cancer diagnosis and all the crap that comes with it...Which, she ultimately BEAT for $28 bucks, and got to experience some welcome side effects:

"Three months ago I got a CA-125 test for ovarian cancer from my doctor, that came back with high numbers. My number was 26, which was 5 points above the recommended 21 (for this particular lab). My doctor wanted me to have an ultrasound ($300 - $1,000), and depending on what it showed, start down the road of expense and medical procedures to fight "cancer." I told my doctor 'NO' and read the chapter on cancer in 'Over the Counter Natural Cures' instead. I then started on an aggressive dose of the herb mentioned in the book, and after three months, and at a cost of about $28, I went for a re-test. My results were NORMAL. When I asked for the actual number, it was 18! I kicked cancer in the butt the easy and affordable way. Taking this herb, and doing some other things recommended in Shane's book, has also helped me to lose 21 lb, and I feel 17 years younger. Many thanks Shane The Peoples Chemist Ellison, I can't wait for your new book."

More people need this book.

My CD set titled Secret Health Files. This is 4-hours of 10-minute audio clips that outline the most bizarre, little-known cures ever discovered by medicine.  I sell this for about $100. If you do the right thing, you get rewarded.

http://clicks.aweber.com/y/ct/?l=FXauB&m=Jc21Cl8Zmh81Zu&b=Yji2SOej33dTYrfD.UHpiQ

support@thepeopleschemist.com


I'm big on memories...But even bigger about preserving them! My new blog post outlines a forgotten, ancient tea that's been
proven to save memory. When I was working as a bench chemist, Big Pharma tried to make a prescription copy-cat of the active ingredients found in the herb.

They failed.

But, that doesn't mean you can't use it to live young!

Kenapa Wanita Tradisional Cina jarang hidap barah payudara


Kenapa Wanita Tradisional Cina jarang hidap

barah payudara



Prof Jane Plant - WHY WOMEN IN CHINA DO NOT GET BREAST CANCER 
By Prof. Jane Plant, PhD, CBE

Topic: WHY DON'T CHINESE WOMEN GET BREAST CANCER Forum: Stage IV and Metastatic Breast Cancer ONLY — This is a forum for those who are facing more treatment and managing the ups and downs of a stage IV or metastatic breast cancer diagnosis. Please respect that this forum is for Stage IV, their families and caring supporters only.

I had no alternative but to die or to try to find a cure for myself. I am a scientist - surely there was a rational explanation for this cruel illness that affects one in 12 women in the UK ?

I had suffered the loss of one breast, and undergone  radiotherapy. I was now receiving painful chemotherapy, and had been seen by some of the country's most eminent specialists. But, deep down, I felt certain I was facing death. I had a loving husband, a beautiful home and two young children to care for. I desperately wanted to live.

Fortunately, this desire drove me to  unearth the facts, some of which were known only to a handful of scientists at the time.

Anyone who has come into contact with breast cancer will know that certain risk factors - such as increasing age, early onset of womanhood, late onset of menopause and a family history of breast cancer - are completely out of our control. But there are many risk factors, which we can control easily.

These "controllable" risk factors readily translate into  simple changes that we can all make in our day-to-day lives to help prevent or treat breast cancer. My message is that even advanced breast cancer can be overcome because I have done it.

The first clue to understanding what was promoting my breast  cancer came when my husband Peter, who was also a scientist, arrived back from working in China while I was being plugged in for a chemotherapy session.

He had brought with him cards and  letters, as well as some amazing herbal suppositories, sent by my friends and science colleagues in China .

The suppositories  were sent to me as a cure for breast cancer. Despite the awfulness of the situation, we both had a good belly laugh, and I remember saying that this was the treatment for breast cancer in China , then it was little wonder that Chinese women avoided getting the disease.

Those words echoed in my mind.

Why didn't Chinese women in  China get breast cancer?

I had collaborated once with Chinese colleagues on a study of links between soil chemistry and disease, and I remembered some of the statistics.

The disease was virtually non-existent throughout the whole country. Only one in 10,000 women in China will die from it, compared to that terrible figure of one in 12 in Britain and the even grimmer average of one in 10 across most Western countries.

It is not just a matter of China being a more rural country, with less urban pollution. In highly urbanized Hong Kong , the rate rises to 34 women in every 10,000 but still puts the West to shame.

The Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki  have similar rates. And remember, both cities were attacked with nuclear weapons, so in addition to the usual pollution-related cancers, one would also expect to find some radiation-related cases, too.

The conclusion we can draw from these statistics strikes you with some force. If a Western woman were to move to industrialized, irradiated Hiroshima , she would slash her risk of contracting breast cancer by half. Obviously this is absurd.

It seemed obvious to me that some lifestyle factor not related to pollution, urbanization or the environment is seriously increasing the Western woman's chance of contracting breast cancer.

I then discovered that whatever causes the huge differences in breast cancer rates between oriental and Western countries, it isn't genetic.

Scientific research showed that when Chinese or Japanese people move to the West, within one or two generations their rates of breast cancer approach those of their host community.

The same thing happens when oriental people adopt a completely Western lifestyle in Hong Kong . In fact, the slang name for breast cancer in China translates as 'Rich Woman's Disease'. This is because, in China , only the better off can afford to eat what is termed ' Hong Kong food'.

The Chinese describe all Western food, including everything from ice cream and chocolate bars to spaghetti  and feta cheese, as "Hong Kong food", because of its availability in the former British colony and its scarcity, in the past, in mainland  China .

So it made perfect sense to me that whatever  was causing my breast cancer  and the shockingly high incidence in this country generally, it was almost certainly something to do with our better-off, middle-class, Western lifestyle.

There is an important point for men here, too. I have observed in my research that much of the data about prostate cancer leads to similar conclusions.

According to figures from the World Health Organization, the number of men contracting prostate cancer in rural China is negligible, only 0.5 men in every 100,000.

In England ,  Scotland and Wales , however, this figure is 70 times higher. Like breast cancer, it is a middle-class disease that primarily attacks the wealthier and higher socio-economic groups, those that can afford to eat rich foods.

I remember saying to my husband, "Come on Peter, you have just come back  from China . What is it about the Chinese way of life that is so different?"

Why don't they get breast cancer?' We decided to utilize our joint scientific backgrounds and approach it  logically.

We examined scientific data that pointed us in the general direction of fats in diets. Researchers had discovered in the 1980s that only l4% of calories in the average Chinese diet were from fat, compared to almost 36% in the West.


But the diet I had been living on for years before I contracted breast cancer was very low in fat and high in fibre.

Besides, I knew as a scientist that fat intake in adults has not been shown to increase risk for breast cancer in most investigations that have followed large groups of women for up to a dozen years.

Then one day something rather special happened. Peter and I have worked together so closely over the years that I am not sure which one of us first said: 

"The Chinese don't eat dairy products!"

It is hard to explain to a non-scientist the sudden mental and emotional 'buzz' you get when you know you have had an important insight. It's as if you have had a lot of pieces of a jigsaw in your mind, and suddenly, in a few seconds, they all fall into place and the whole picture is clear.

Suddenly I recalled how many Chinese people were physically unable to  tolerate milk, how the Chinese people I had worked with had always said that milk was only for babies, and how one of my close friends, who is of Chinese origin, always politely turned down the cheese course at dinner parties.

I knew of no Chinese people who lived a traditional Chinese life who ever used cow or other dairy food to feed their babies. The tradition was to use a wet nurse but never, ever, dairy products.

Culturally, the Chinese find our Western preoccupation with milk and milk products very   strange. I remember entertaining a large delegation of Chinese scientists shortly after the ending of the Cultural Revolution in the 1980s.

On advice from the Foreign Office, we had asked the caterer to provide a pudding that contained a lot of ice cream. After inquiring what the pudding consisted of, all of the Chinese, including their interpreter, politely but firmly refused to eat it, and they could not be persuaded to change their minds.

At the time we were all delighted and ate extra portions!

Milk, I discovered, is one of the most common causes of food allergies .

Over 70% of the world's population are unable to digest the milk sugar, lactose, which has led nutritionists to believe that this is the normal condition for adults, not some sort of deficiency. Perhaps nature is trying to tell us that we are eating the wrong food.

Before I had breast cancer for the first time, I had eaten a lot of dairy produce, such as skimmed milk, low-fat cheese and yogurt. I had used it as my main source of protein. I also ate cheap but lean minced beef, which I now realized was probably often ground-up dairy cow.

In order to cope with the chemotherapy I received for my fifth case of cancer, I had been eating organic yogurts as a way of helping my digestive tract to recover and repopulate my gut with 'good' bacteria.

Recently, I discovered that way back in 1989 yogurt had been implicated in ovarian cancer. Dr Daniel Cramer of Harvard University studied hundreds of women with ovarian cancer, and had them record in detail what they normally ate. Wish I'd been made aware of his findings when he had first discovered them.

Following Peter's and my insight into the Chinese diet, I decided to give up not just yogurt but all dairy produce immediately. Cheese, butter, milk and yogurt and anything else that contained dairy produce - it went down the sink or in the rubbish.


It is surprising how many products, including commercial soups, biscuits and cakes, contain some form of dairy produce. Even many proprietary brands of margarine marketed as soya, sunflower or olive oil spreads can contain dairy produce.

I therefore became an avid reader of the small print on food labels.

Up to this point, I had been steadfastly measuring the progress of my fifth cancerous lump with callipers and plotting the results. Despite all the encouraging comments and positive feedback from my doctors and nurses, my own precise observations told me the bitter truth.

My first chemotherapy sessions had produced no effect - the lump was still the same size.

Then I eliminated dairy products. Within days, the lump started to shrink.

About two weeks after my second chemotherapy session and one week after giving up dairy produce, the lump in my neck started to itch. Then it began to soften and to reduce  in size. The line on the graph, which had shown no change, was now pointing downwards as the tumour got smaller and smaller.

And, very significantly, I noted that instead of declining exponentially (a graceful curve) as cancer is meant to do, the tumour's decrease in size was plotted on a straight line heading off the bottom of the graph, indicating a cure, not suppression (or remission) of the tumour.

One Saturday afternoon after about six weeks of excluding all dairy produce from my diet, I practised an hour of meditation then felt for what was left of the lump. I couldn't find it. Yet I was very experienced at detecting cancerous lumps - I had discovered all five cancers on my own. I went downstairs and asked my husband to feel my neck. He could not find any trace of the lump either.

On the following Thursday I was due to be seen by my cancer specialist at   Charing Cross Hospital in London . He examined me thoroughly, especially my neck where the tumour had been. He was initially bemused and then delighted as he said, "I cannot find it." None of my doctors, it appeared, had expected someone with my type and stage of cancer (which had clearly spread to the lymph system) to survive, let alone be so hale and hearty.

My specialist was as overjoyed as I was. When I first discussed my ideas with him he was understandably sceptical. But I understand that he now uses maps showing cancer mortality in China in his lectures, and recommends a non-dairy diet to his cancer patients.

I now believe that the link between dairy produce and breast cancer is similar to the link between smoking and lung cancer.

I believe that identifying the link between breast cancer and dairy produce, and then developing a diet specifically targeted at maintaining the health of my breast and hormone system, cured me.

It was difficult for me, as it may be for you, to accept that a substance as 'natural' as milk might have such ominous health implications. But I am a living proof that it works and, starting from tomorrow, I shall reveal the secrets of my revolutionary action plan.

Extracted from Your Life in Your Hands, by Professor Jane Plan.